正文
VOA慢速英语:A Lack of Education for Young Children Affects the Country's Economic Progress
来自美国之音慢速英语,这里是教育报道。
A new study finds a lack of education for young children in developing nations seriously affects the country's economic progress. The organization Results for Development called R4D performed the study. The Non-Governmental group is based in Washington D.C. Its study says children who are not attending primary school are an unused source of economic growth for their country.
一项新的研究发现,发展中国家儿童缺乏教育会严重影响该国的经济发展。发展成果研究组织(R4D)进行了该研究。这家非政府组织总部设在华盛顿特区。其研究称,那些没有上小学的儿童是他们国家经济增长中一项未被利用的资源。
R4D says it performed the study because it was worried about a growing worldwide problem in education. The group found 57 million children of primary school age are not in school, most of them are from sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia.
R4D称,他们进行这项研究是因为其担心教育这个日益增长的世界难题。该组织发现5700万小学适龄儿童没有入学,大部分来自撒哈拉以南非洲和东南亚。
Milan Thomas works for R4D. He says there has been progress in reducing the number of children who do not attend school, but he says that progress has slowed in recent years. He says there is no disagreement that children with basic education can look forward to a better life.
Milan Thomas为R4D组织工作。他说,已经在减少辍学儿童数量上取得了进展,但他说,这一进展在最近几年有所放缓。他说,毫无疑问,受过基础教育的儿童可以期待更美好的生活。
"The benefits associated with primary education are really undisputed at this point because there are countless studies showing that children who complete basic education tend to enjoy better health and higher incomes over their lifetimes," said Thomas.
Thomas称,“在小学教育的好处这点上没有争议,因为有无数的研究显示,完成基础教育的孩子在往往其一生中享有更好的健康和收入水平。”
But he says even though the value of education is known, it is important to find new ways of proving that value. So the organization led its work with the question, "what is the estimated cost to a nation's economy of its out–of-school children? "
但他说,尽管教育的价值已知的,找到新办法来证明该价值很重要。因此,该组织带着这一问题展开了工作,“一个国家的失学儿童对其经济估计有多大损失?”
The study uses information from the UNESCO Institute for Statistics, as well as studies of developing labor markets. The results estimate the losses suffered by 20 developing countries if more young children can not get basic education. Milan Thomas says the study also considered earnings the children not attending primary school would never receive.
该研究采用了来自联合国教科文组织统计研究所以及其它发展中国家劳动力市场研究的资料。结果估计了20个发展中国家如果有更多儿童得不到基础教育将要遭受的损失。Milan Thomas称,这项研究还考虑了没上小学的儿童无法获得的那些盈利。
He says the research found that it is far more costly in sub-Saharan Africa to have primary school age children out of school than to educate them. He notes the cost to provide all children with primary education is much less than the average cost of not providing the schooling. He says the cost of educating children is more than the value of a full year's average economic growth for five countries in the study: they are Ivory Coast, Gambia, Mali, Senegal and Yemen.
他说,研究发现,撒哈拉以南非洲地区小学适龄儿童失学的损失比教育他们的成本更高昂。他指出,为所有儿童提供小学教育的花费比不提供教育的平均损失要少得多。他说,在这项研究中,有5个国家教育儿童的费用超出了全年平均经济增长带来的价值。他们是科特迪瓦、冈比亚、马里、塞内加尔和也门。
Mr Thomas says the cost of children being out-of-school in Senegal is nearly 8 percent of the country's total goods and services. He said Nigeria has the highest number of out-of-school children — 10 million. He said that will cost the country billions of dollars.
Thomas先生称,塞内加尔儿童辍学的代价占到该国全部商品和服务价值的8%。他说,尼日利亚有着最多的失学儿童--1千万人,他说,这将使该国损失数十亿美元。
He says he hopes the study will prove to local governments and policy makers the value of a basic education for all children. And he says he hopes it will move them to provide that education to primary school age children in their country.
他说,希望该研究向当地政府和政策制定者证实普及儿童基础教育的价值。而且他说,他希望这能推动他们在其国家为小学适龄儿童提供教育。
相关文章
- Schools that Removed Police Officers Bring Them Back
- Let's Get to the 'Root of the Problem'
- 'The Fall of the House of Usher,' by Edgar Allan Poe, Part One
- What Does It Mean to 'Hit the Nail on the Head'?
- Scientists Record Largest ‘Marsquakes’ on the Red Planet
- Are You Guilty of 'Sitting on the Fence?'
- What Does It Mean to Get the 'Greenlight?'
- Climate Scientists: There Is Hope
- 'Fresh As a Daisy,' Other Daisy Expressions
- Should We Think ‘Outside’ or ‘Outside of’ the Box?