托福备考：综合写作TPO解析一

阅读部分表达方法：passage, material

听力部分表达方法：lecture, the professors says

同意: say, argue, claim, opinion, hold the view that, figure, deem, believe, reckon, consider, opinion, proposition,

反对：on contrary, by contrast, argue against, refute, object, hold a totally different view, oppose, be against.

TIP：在行文过程中，需要变化的是表示同意或者反对的功能性词汇，而表示阅读部分和听力部分的指代型词汇请不要变化。就像你跟人介绍我，不能在整个过程中说沐浴、沐沐、达芙妮、muyuruc，这样会让听者或者读者摸不到头绪的，我们语言多样性的表达要用在需要的地方。

文章结构：

第一段：要表达的内容有：passage部分的主观点，lecture部分的主观点，以及两者之间的关系。

第二段：passage部分的sub point 1，lecture部分对应的sub point，lecture里面相对应的support和details。

第三段：passage部分的sub point 2，lecture部分对应的sub point，lecture里面相对应的support和details。

第四段：passage部分的sub point 3，lecture部分对应的sub point，lecture里面相对应的support和details。

TIP：没有必要在文章中出现passage部分的support和details，或者说不能出现。

例文（仅供参考）

综合写作对语言的要求是清晰表达，准确转述即可（其实独立写作的要求也类似）。没有必要可以的追求语言的华丽，把话说清楚最重要。有的同学语言使用的能力还有一定局限的情况下，千万不要刻意追求句式的复杂化，因为这样的后果就是写出来的句子个个都有错，个个都有表达不清。同时，那些语言能力好的同学也要注意语言的简洁，无论是何种语言，总最好的词表达最多的内容都是很厉害的呀。从句套从句的句子，我不希望在写作部分看到。

The passage argues that four-day work week will benefit companies, the whole economy, and individuals. But in the lecture, the professor holds a totally different view that no one will be beneficial from the new work week.

Firstly, the passage says that companies will get more profits for employees can work more effectively. However, the lecture points out that four-day workweek will lead to spend more. That is because companies have to spend more money on training, medical benefits, office positions, even new computers.

Secondly, the passage claims that the four-day workweek is a way to reduce unemployment rates. The lecture refutes the idea completely. Admittedly, there are more available jobs, but companies will prefer to let employees work overtime to finish them for hiring new staff is too expensive. In addition, the companies may lift their expectation that staff finish five-day jobs within four-day.

Thirdly, the passage suggests that individual employees can benefit from it. Though the four-day workweek can provide more leisure time to employees, the lecture argues against the passage. Comparing to five-day workers, the four-day workweek employees may be the first one to be fire during economic depression. And they will have less chance to promotion because companies wish that managers could be on duty every work day.