和谐英语

您现在的位置是:首页 > 托福考试 > 托福写作

正文

托福写作范文点评和思路解析:终身雇佣制的利弊

2020-12-03来源:互联网

  写作难点话题一览

  Should businesses hire employees for their entire lives?

  Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

  写作思路展开结构分析

  不同意比较好写一些。因为题目中的entire这个词是一个过于绝对的修饰词,所以一般来说应该是要反对的。企业雇用人员的原则应该是以利益为上,能够为企业带来更多利润的员工才侄儿雇佣,但企业对于员工也是有义务要负责的,特别是那些做出过重大贡献的员工。大家可以结合这两方面来拓展观点。

  本话题高分范文赏析

  The decision to hire an employee for life is a serious commitment on the part of both parties. For the employee, such an arrangement means lifetime job security. From the perspective of an employer, however, the deal is not so sweet. Guaranteed lifetime employment, or tenure, at a company, can promote bad work habits, prevent innovation, and lead to potentially disastrous personnel problems. When a workers' employment is contingent upon their job performance, they will tend to work diligently. On the other hand, if workers know that no matter how hard they work, they will receive the same amount of money and have no chance of being fired, there are no incentives for them to work. For people to be model workers they need compelling reasons to work hard and produce work of the highest quality. A tenure-system promotes laziness, inefficiency and low-quality work because it fails to offer incentives for good work, and fails to offer compelling deterrents against bad work. Secondly, companies that offer lifetime positions to employees cannot adapt to a rapidly changing world. For instance, if an employee who was hired by a company twenty years ago might be too old to effectively learn new computer-related skills. In today's modern office environment, companies that cannot make effective use of new technology are at a severe disadvantage to those that can. In this case, a company that does not have the freedom to restructure, hiring and firing employees, in accordance with shifting demands is likely to fail. A company that provides its employees with tenure effectively locks out new blood and runs the risk of being paralyzed by a staff unable to change with the times. Finally, offering tenure to employees is a major risk because of unforeseeable personnel problems. Every office, no matter how well managed, is bound to have personality conflicts. In many cases, personality conflicts can lead to one of the feuding parties leaving the company. But if the conflict involves two tenured employees, the business might be seriously affected, even destroyed. Despite the uncertainty it brings to workers lives, the company must look out for its own best interests first and not allow this disastrous situation to occur by not instituting a tenure policy.