经济学人下载:奥巴马尝试改造美国的学校

NCLB exposed the dismal performance of schools. But it has also demonstrated how clumsy Washington’s hand can be. A requirement for “highly qualified” teachers turns out to have helped keep states from hiring good ones. State standards diverge wildly. NCLB’s main goal, for all pupils to be proficient in reading and maths by 2014, is unrealistic. And thanks to an odd way of judging schools, more than 80% may be labelled as “failing” this year.

LCLB暴露了学校的糟糕表现。但是它也展现了华盛顿之手是何等笨拙。一项关于“高质量”教师的要求结果导致州政府无法择优聘请。鉴于各州的标准相差巨，NCLB的主要目标，即到2014年前让所有小学生熟练掌握阅读和算术技能，根本不切实际。因为古怪的评判方法，今年估计超过80%的学校可能将被打上“失败”的标记。

Mr Obama has already offered one new model: dangle carrots for reform and hope that states bite. The stimulus offered more than $4 billion in grants for states that made certain changes, such as lifting caps on the number of charter schools and devising new ways to evaluate teachers. No state had to apply for the grant programme, Race to the Top, but 46 did.

奥巴马先生已经提出了一个新模式，即提供改革奖励，希望各州会动心。超过40亿美元的奖励将以补贴的形式提供给那些实施某类变革的州，例如取消特许学校的数额上限和制定新的教师考评办法。这项名为“力争上游”（Race to the Top）的计划并非强制参加，目前已有46个州参与进来。

With the new version of NCLB, Mr Obama can go further. He wants to set clear goals but give states more flexibility in meeting them. His plan would fix NCLB’s most obvious failings, such as neglecting to track the progress of individual pupils. Only the worst schools would face dramatic intervention. Districts would evaluate teachers on a range of factors, including pupil performance.

凭借新版NCLB，奥巴马先生可以走得更远。他希望设定清晰的目标，但就实现方式上留给各州更多的自由。他的计划将弥补 NCLB 最明显的缺陷，比如忽视了对于单个学生的进步跟踪。只有最糟的学校将面临积极干涉。学区将根据一系列因素（包括学生成绩）来考评教师。

Such plans would seem ripe for bipartisan compromise. Gene Wilhoit, director of the Council of Chief State School Officers, thinks that Mr Obama has moved in the right direction. Many of the president’s priorities, such as improving teaching, overlap with those of conservatives.

这样的计划看上去很容易获得两党妥协。州立学校校长协会（Council of Chief State School Officers）主任吉恩韦-贺特（Gene Wilhoit）认为奥巴马先生选择了正确的方向。总统的许多优先事项，比如改进教育质量，都与保守主义者的关注点相重叠。

But Republicans are wary. John Kline, the chairman of the House education committee, frets that states spend too much time complying with federal rules. Race to the Top had good goals, but poor implementation. He is dubious about the proposed interventions for failing schools—a concern he shares with the teachers’ unions. Mr Kline’s party now faces an awkward choice. If the Republicans pass a new version of NCLB, they will give Mr Obama a victory. But if they do nothing, Democrats will blame them for failing to fix a law that voters have come to hate.

但是共和党人很谨慎。众议院教育委员会主席约翰-克莱恩（John Kline）为各州花太多时间来满足联邦规定而感到不安。“力争上游”计划的目标很好，但是实施很糟。就计划中针对未达标学校所提议的干预措施，他尚持怀疑态度——教师工会也有同样的顾虑。现在，克莱恩先生所在的共和党面临一个尴尬的选择。如果共和党人通过新版NCLB，他们将给奥巴马先生一个胜利。但是如果他们什么也不做，民主党人将责怪他们未能顺应民意修复一项有问题的法律。